A.T.V Home / Index.

Online Shop.

Planning Your Install.

Aerials..

Loft Aerials.

ATV`s Choice Of Aerials.

TV Aerial Tests.

Aerial Reports.

Aerial Positioning Tests.

Splitters and  Amps.

Poles & Brackets.

Cable & Leads.

FM / DAB Radio.

Digital TV.

Nationwide Transmitters.

Digital Transmitters.

Transmitter Maps.

Cowboys` Locker.

419 Langsett Rd
Hillsborough
Sheffield
S6 2LL
© 2010 Justin Smith A.T.V
All Rights reserved
Free P&P for orders over £100, Online or by Phone           Tel : 0114 285 4254                 Contact Us

Main Page List

View cart button

Site not displaying correctly ?

TV Aerials For Canal Boats and Caravans

 

Subjects are listed on this page in the following order :

 

The Particular problems of Boat / Caravan TV reception

Aerial Recommendations for Boat / Caravan TV reception

Maximising your TV picture quality on a Boat / Caravan (including a worked example)

Mounting Aerials On Boats and On Caravans

 

The Particular Problems of Boat / Caravan TV Reception

 

Since any aerial used for reception on a boat or caravan is usually required to work at different locations it is a given that a wideband aerial is required, with all the inherent disadvantages that this can bring in poor signal locations, particularly for A group,

B group and K group transmitters. Much as I dislike wideband aerials (wideband Yagis anyway) it must be admitted that the requirement for one is the least of the problems for

a boater, or caravaner. Many sites are in poor locations, especially for boaters as

waterways tend to be in valleys ! (see Importance of Line of Sight). Furthermore space,

for storage of the aerial, is usually at a premium on a boat or in a caravan, so an aerial

of large physical size is problematic. Unfortunately, as a general rule, larger aerials give

more gain (i.e. more signal) and smaller ones less gain. Just using an aerial amplifier

to “boost” the signal from a low gain antenna is unlikely to be effective. I certainly found this to be my general experience, particularly when used with an Omni directional aerial.

Since the aerial is being put up and taken down regularly it needs to be pretty strong as well, I`ve seen some which are literally falling apart, though they`ll probably still give a decent picture in good reception areas !

Speaking of the latter, it is important to understand that the range of possible signal strengths available in this country is HUGE, see article on this subject.  

Our recommended aerial for boats and caravans, the DM Log Periodic, near Bosley locks

The fact a large aerial is out of the question is probably a blessing in disguise, because it is

highly doubtful that the mounting for it (on a boat or caravan) would be strong enough to withstand a strong wind anyway ! On the subject of bracketry and poles, that`s another problem, because aerials should be mounted as high as possible (particularly in poor reception locations) and it`s doubtful that the average boat owner / caravan owner wants a 20ft mast bolted to the side of their pride and joy. That said, a lot have satellite dishes,

and they`re hardly aesthetically pleasing either, especially on a canal boat......

 

Actually all of the above is only the start of it, the biggest problem is that getting the best

signal involves juggling with not one, not two, but three variables :

 

1 The direction of the transmitter is the most obvious variable, your aerial must be pointing

at it (unless you`re right next to a main transmitter ! ) or your picture will be poor.

 

2 The tuning of the transmitter(s) which you`re trying to receive. Even if you`re right next to

Emley Moor your screen will be just a snowstorm if your set is not tuned into it !

 

3 The third variable is often overlooked, and that is the polarity of the transmitter(s).

Get the wrong polarity and you could be losing up to 90% (or more) of your signal.

 

See Maximising Picture Quality

 

Aerial Recommendations for Boat / Caravan TV reception

 

It is possible to eliminate two of the variables mentioned above, namely direction and

polarity considerations, by using an omnidirectional or “Omni” aerial.

The problem with this strategy is, how can I put this, Omni aerials are c**p.

The gain of an Omni is negative (an Omni  FM aerial is minus 3 dB) but that`s without

taking into account the additional loss of signal that results from an incorrectly polarised

antenna. Furthermore their beam width, to eliminate unwanted signals, is, well, zero !

If you get a good picture off an Omni TV aerial it`s because you`re in a good signal area

anyway, I reckon that a coat hanger would work just as well.

I have always said that Omni directional TV aerials can`t be any good, but that was a

theoretical position until we hired a boat which came with one fitted. Much to the

annoyance of my wife, I was able to experiment as to the differences between an Omni and

the aerial I recommend for touring, a DM Log Periodic. I`m a fan of Log Periodic aerials

and this model is well suited to the role of touring. It`s reasonably compact (2ft 9in long)

bearing in mind that you never get anything for nothing, all things being equal a smaller

aerial will give you less gain / signal. The DM`s pretty strongly made and because it`s

nearly all metal in construction it`s eminently fixable if it gets damaged, as any touring

aerial is bound to be...... Furthermore, Log aerials are flat, thus making storage much

easier and lowering the risk of the antenna being damaged.

At a conservative estimate the gain* of the DM Log would be about 6 to 7 dB and since we use it as a control aerial for all our antenna testing its relative gain to all our other aerials

can be seen on the relevant graphs. On the subject of which we sometimes get asked if a Log40 would be a better choice (for a boat/ caravan aerial) than a DM Log because its gain is a bit higher. Well yes and no would be my answer. You do get a bit more signal out of a Log40, but on the other hand the DM Log is a bit smaller, it has a tilting clamp, and it`s more easily fixable if it gets damaged. So basically I`d always recommend the DM Log !

 

See customer feedback using a DM Log on a canal boat.                  

 

* Take aerial manufacturers gain figures with a pinch of salt......

The big problem with a directional aerial over an Omni is it usually requires quite a bit more effort to get a TV picture. The thing is that the end result is nearly always better, as with

so much of life, minimum effort = minimum result (and minimum satisfaction......)

So how much difference was there between the Omni aerial and the DM Log ?

I compared the signals on analogue and digital at two different locations and at different times of the day, on all tests the Log outperformed the Omni, as expected. It should be pointed out that detecting small differences in the aerials performance was made more difficult by the fact that the TV was an LCD, with their inherent picture inferiority over a CRT.

Below is typical result for a reasonable signal area on analogue transmissions, this was

off Moel Y Parc transmitter. Further down is a test in a poor signal area.  

Channel

 

BBC1

 

 

BBC2

 

 

ITV

 

 

C4 / S4C

Omni directional TV aerial

 

A bit grainy (worse than the Log)

 

 

A bit grainy (worse than the Log)

 

 

Grainy, fairly bad patterning and ghosting, interference lines on LHS

 

A bit grainy (worse than the Log)

DM Log Periodic TV aerial

 

Slightly grainy

 

 

Slightly grainy

 

 

Almost perfect picture  ! ? !

 

 

Slightly grainy

Notes    

To a TV engineer there is no such thing as a perfect picture, especially on an LCD or plasma....

It must be admitted that to get such good pictures off an aerial (any aerial....) mounted on the roof of a canal boat, it must have been a pretty good signal area. I wouldn`t expect this to be the case at most sites. However this throws into sharp focus how poor the Omni

was, by producing such a poor ITV. I was actually quite surprised and had to keep

swapping between the two aerials to confirm that this was in fact the case.

 

A more rigorous test was on the digital channels in the morning mist. The Log picked up all the Freeview programmes (that I could be bothered to check) with no problems, though

it must be admitted that all digital channels can block / freeze sporadically, no matter how good the signal. That`s due to skimping (by the broadcasters) on the error correction data,

i.e. trying to cram too many channels into the available bandwidth, see digital negatives.

The Omni failed to pick up half of the digital channels or was blocking in an annoying fashion, I wouldn`t have put up with it had I actually wanted to watch the programme...

That said, it performed significantly better than this the previous night in the different

weather conditions prevailing at the time. Then it was picking up most (but not all) of the channels OK, though the signal levels / quality were about 40% lower than with the Log.

Not that I would fully trust those figures anyway, how can they be that accurate when a digital meter costs £1000 plus, and the average set top box costs £30 !

 

We also spent a night moored up at the foot of the Bosley locks and I automatically

went onto Winter Hill transmitter (to the NNW) as every one else was on it !

I subsequently discovered that Moel Y Parc transmitter (to the West) produced better results, but some examples of the pictures off Winter Hill are shown below to illustrate

what one can expect to receive in a poor signal area..

BBC1 analogue off an Omni aerial
ITV teletext off an Omni aerial
Analogue BBC1 off a DM Log aerial
ITV teletext off a DM Log aerial

Above we have BBC1 on the left and the text off ITV (i.e. none) on the right from an Omni,

and below we have the same off a DM Log.

Omni aerial, only recommended for strong signal areas.....
Our recommended aerial for boats and caravans, the DM Log Periodic.
Winter Hill and Moel Y Parc transmitters relative to Bosley locks
Canal boating holidays, expensive ?  But recommended.

The DM Log can just about be seen to the left of my wife and my parents as they finish their wine outside in the dusk, the aerial is more clearly seen in the reflection on the water !

This is one of my favourite pictures and if it doesn`t put you in the mood for boating,

then nothing will......                                    Inland Waterways Association

 

Caravan / Boat Aerial Pole Installations

 

It`s all very well having your aerial(s) and knowing how to get the best of them, but how do you install the pole that it`ll mount on ?

Permanent installations require a bit of thought and are outside the scope of this article but there`s a picture below left of a neat method of attaching the pole to a canal boat.

 

Incidentally, you`re probably better not choosing white cable. It may look nice when brand

new, but it`ll start showing up the dirt and then you`ll wish you`d gone for black cable !

Caravan A Frame clamp in use
Neat attachment for TV aerial, pity it`s a crappy contract type !

An alternative method of temporarily attaching an aerial to a (canal) boat is shown above.

This install involves lashing a “caravan” pole to the tiller with insulation tape. If you use decent quality tape and stretch it tight it works fine, but you do need to tie off the tiller so it doesn`t move and realign your aerial !

When you hand the boat back you just cut the tape off, no damage whatsoever. Whilst cruising you can detach the top section or two (picture above left) and just clip it back on when you moor up. The picture below right is a DM log Periodic (vertically polarised ! ) on Skipton transmitter, with a perfect picture incidentally. We don`t actually watch that much TV whilst boating (that`s hardly the reason one spends all that dosh on a boat is it ! ) but there are certain programmes - in this case it was “Saxondale” - which you don`t really

want to miss, or see through a snowstorm....

Caravan aerial pole temporarily attached to canal boat tiller
Caravan aerial pole temporarily attached to canal boat tiller, DM log aligned onto Skipton transmitter

The picture on the left is of a caravan “A frame” clamp in use. It has the obvious advantage

of easy “non invasive” installation, but the Through Bracket on the right would obviously be more supportive. It could be used with a short pole sticking above the caravan roof, or the 10ft “caravan” pole could be clamped nearer the aerial than with the A frame clamp.

Both these clamps only take a 1” pole, such as the aforementioned caravan pole.

In the case of the Through Bracket we also stock a 3ft x 1” pole specially for it.

I`m not actually a caravanner (though my parents in law are ! ) but I don`t see why the

board method” shouldn`t work on the roof of a caravan, certainly one with a flat(ish) roof.

The above permanent install is nice and neat, though I can`t say I`m impressed

by his (or her) choice of crappy Contract

aerial though, esp a gold one !

Aerial attached to gang plank, non destructive and neat

Now this is a good idea, you can mount the aerial in the highest spot available without drilling into your pride and joy !  I`d have

thought a slightly stronger mount would be better though, e.g one of our straight loft kits.

Through bracket
Through bracket, side view

Maximising Your TV Picture Quality on a Boat / Caravan

 

The first thing to do if you want to maximise your picture quality from your TV aerial is

to avoid using an Omni directional antenna !  Well, sort of, explanations below......

As mentioned above in my opinion, the best aerial for a caravan or canal boat is a DM Log Periodic and that is the one I use when we hire a boat.

 

As we have seen there are three variables to be overcome if one is to get the best

possible picture and, apart from local knowledge, there are two ways of achieving this.

 

The first involves research, knowing where all the transmitters are, their frequencies and what polarity they are. All this information is readily available but requires collating and remembering, or filing somewhere.....

For locations try our Transmitter Maps or the Digital Transmitter map or Ofcom Maps or MB21`s map page or BBC maps. For frequencies/ polarities try the last two.

Always bear in mind the over riding importance of “Line Of Sight” to the transmitter.

Even with all this info, unless it`s obvious which is the best transmitter to go for, it may

well require a bit of effort and time when you actually moor up (or park up your caravan)

to ensure that you really are getting the best possible signal.

It is quite a satisfying achievement though !

 

There is another way of maximising you signal quality which avoids most of the above complication. I may not rate Omni aerials for actual reception, but they are bleedin`

handy when it comes to finding the best transmitter to use your other aerial on !  

How`s that then ?

Right, you moor up. You plug your Omni directional aerial in to you TV and scan right through the band, either manually or on “auto setup”. If by sheer good luck you get a

picture you`re happy with, you can just stick with the Omni for your nights viewing.

If you aren`t happy with the picture, select the channel with the best signal that the Omni has just found, then plug a decent aerial in, e.g. our DM Log. Now peak it up (direction and polarity wise) on that channel. Lastly, if necessary, tune all the other stations in. Done.

It may, or may not, be perfect, but it`s probably as good as you can get !

 

A cheaper, but less accurate, method of finding the strongest signal is to use one of those basic signal strength meters. Ironically the fact that a professional installer would laugh at one of those means that it`s actually very handy for finding the strongest source of TV signal, regardless of frequency. What I mean by that is using a more sophisticated type of meter (or indeed the picture on your TV) is a far more sensitive guide to the best alignment for your aerial, but you`ve got to have it tuned in to the right frequency for it to do so !  

Since you don`t need to “tune in” those cheap type signal strength meters you eliminate

one of the three variables though don`t forget you still need to check which polarisation is required. So to be sure you`ve covered that particular variable you may have to go through the whole signal finding process twice, once with your aerial horizontally polarised, and again with your aerial vertically polarised.  

Finally the strongest signal may not be the best quality and those cheap meters only check for signal strength, you TV picture shows up both signal quality and signal strength !

 

Worked Example of Using an Omni to Maximise Picture Quality

 

As mentioned above, we spent the first night at the foot of Bosley Locks, 4m NE of Congleton. All of the other boats seemed to be on Winter Hill with their aerials pointing

NNW. Since there looked to be a reasonably clear “line of sight” in this direction I went

with it and it worked reasonably on the Log Periodic. The following morning I thought I`d experiment with the Omni and got the TV to do a search with it connected. Much to my surprise it was picking up a reasonable BBC1 on CH 52 and BBC2 on CH 45. Now I`d done

a bit of research on all the likely transmitters in this part of the world, but none had those programmes on those channels. I was intrigued. Referring to my trusty little BBC/ITC booklet “Television Transmitting Stations” (they don`t do it any more, you`ve got to print reams of A4 off the websites, such is “progress” ) I realised it must be Moel Y Parc !

I cranked the Log over to the West (Moel is the same polarity) and connected it up,

result, almost perfect pictures.

Apart from proving the usefulness of an Omni as a transmitter finder, it also underlined yet again how important “line of sight” is. Remember that Winter Hill was 34 miles away and kicks out 500kW (analogue), Moel Y Parc was 48 miles and only transmits at 100kW.

Gordon Bennet, an Omni TV aerial is smarter than I am, not good for the ego....

 

Below is an extract from our transmitter map showing Bosley, Moel Y Parc & Winter Hill.

There are some other smaller repeater transmitters in the same area (Over Biddulph, Congleton, Langley and Macclesfield) which can be seen on the full size version of the

aforementioned map, details of the latter repeaters are here.

Site

 

 

Ely (Nth of)

 

Stretham

 

St Neots

“Set Top” TV aerial (on the roof)

CHs 1 to 4         C5

 

Poor                 Virtually Nothing

 

Reasonable      Poor

 

Very Good        Reasonable

DM Log Periodic TV aerial

CHs 1 to 4           C5

 

Good                  Poor (but there ! )

 

Nearly Perfect    Good

 

Nearly Perfect    Nearly Perfect

In May 2009 we hired a cruiser on the River Great Ouse from Ely, which was more scenic

than you`d think by the way, though the locks were busy on the Bank Holiday Monday !

Anyway the boat came with a set top type aerial but a reasonably good one, a small Log

Periodic in fact. I took the opportunity to compare it to my DM Log and the results are

summarised in the table below. I`ve split the results into CHs 1 to 4 and C5 because the latter is low power and restricted in its radiation pattern, therefore receiving it requires a lot more from the aerial. I put the set top on the roof (when comparing them) and it worked

reasonably at most site because, let`s face it, it`s pretty flat and not that far from Sandy

transmitter ! In fact when we moored up at St Neots we could see the it, loud and proud on

the horizon. Even the set top (including when actually on the set top ! ) gave a very good

picture, thus explaining why some people think their Omnis are great. It`s all about signal

strength, even an Omni inside the boat would have given a good picture there....

More problematic was when we were North of Ely (and in Cambridge) though Stretham was

about mid way between the two, signal wise.

These results are for analogue rather than digital because the boat only had analogue TV

but as it happens analogue is more sensitive to small differences in signal anyway, so the tests are more meaningful.

Removable aerial mounting
Removable aerial mounting, close up

If you haven`t got a gang plank to

mount your aerial on try something like

this. It`s one of our straight loft kits

mounted on a piece of 18mm plywood.

I tried it when we were on the River

Great Ouse and it worked fine. It was

stable enough to not blow over despite

the wind requiring us to swing round on

the bow then reverse off the moorings,

on more than one occasion.....

Make sure the feet on the corners are

“grippy” type rubber, plastic ones would

be more likely to just slide in any wind.

Use roofing bolts to attach the loft kit to the board, because their low profile heads won`t stand too proud of the board (below) and touch the boat`s roof.

Storage tip, removing the pole from the mounting (c/w aerial) takes up far less space on the

boat, and ensures the aerial doesn`t get knocked off when going through a guillotine lock !

aerialsandtv.com

Double Clamp

Neat removable way

of attaching an aerial pole to another vertical tube. These are particularly well suited to bolt an aerial pole onto a caravan jockey wheel. Ideally you should use two, but you could just use the top one and press the pole into the ground.

If you`ve found this site informative and, hopefully, interesting as well,

please help us increase the number of people reading it.

 

The BBC1 picture off the DM Log is not as good as it looks in the photo, it was a bit grainy, but it was obviously far better than off the Omni.

Similarly there are a few glitches on the ITV text, but again, it`s a different ball game

to the Omni`s non existent teletext reception.

The site was the foot of Bosley Locks and the transmitter was Winter Hill.

Note the weather, not that pleasant for going through 12 locks.....