Main Page List

View cart button

Scholars welcome !

Online Brackets & Clamps Shop

Brackets / Clamps Shop

A.T.V Home / Index

A.T.V Home / Index

A.T.V Home / Index Online Shop

Online Shop

Online Aerials

Aerials Shop

Contact Us

Free delivery on orders over £100.

Online Shop
© 2016 Justin Smith A.T.V
All Rights reserved
Online Splitters & Amps

Splitters / Amps Shop

Planning Your Install

Planning Your Install



Loft Aerials

Loft Aerials

Boat / Caravan Aerials

Boat / Caravan Aerials

ATV`s Choice Of Aerials

ATV`s Choice Of Aerials

TV Aerial Tests

TV Aerial Tests

Aerial Reports

Aerial Reports

Aerial Positioning Tests

Aerial Positioning Tests

Brackets & Clamps

Brackets / Clamps

Cable & Connectors

Cable / Connectors

FM / DAB Radio

FM / DAB Radio

Nationwide Transmitters

Nationwide Transmitters

The Main Digital TV Transmitters

Main Digital Transmitters

Transmitter Maps

Transmitter Maps

Cowboys` Locker

Cowboys’ Locker

Splitters and  Amps

Splitters / Amplifiers

How To Attach / Wire Up Plugs & Aerials

Wiring up plugs & aerials


Appendix (incl satellite)

Basic fault finding

on digital TV

Online Cable & Leads

Cable / Misc. Shop

Contact Us

Brackets & Clamps

Poles / Masts

Online Poles and Masts shop

Poles / Masts Shop

Aerial Pole and Bracket Tests

Poles / Brackets Tests

Gain (curves), Again                                      (See Aerial Tests)

This page is strictly for the cognoscenti (mainly “the trade”), and those with

an unhealthy interest in TV aerial performance.......

The gain curves are conservative estimates, but I bet they`re not that far out.........

One things for sure, they`re all accurate relative to each other, which is what matters !

Note these curves are in dBd, that is gain compared to a half wave dipole,

NOT (the dishonest ? ) dBi....

Typical Contract 10 gain curves

B group Contract aerial curves    (including Extending The Aerial Groups)

A group gain curves and comparisons

B group gain curves and comparisons

C/D group gain curves and comparisons

K group gain curves and comparisons

E group gain curves and comparisons

Wideband / T group gain curves and comparisons

Just how much gain do you get from a 10 element Contract aerial ?

These were relatively good quality Contracts (they had baluns) and it cannot be overstressed that some Contract aerials` performance can be very inconsistent, and this is particularly the case outside of their designed for group, see below.

Note that the A group curve is that for post 1995 aerials, when the A group was extended up to CH 37 from CH 34, see below. Thus the response curve for aerials fitted prior to this date would be about three channels down.

Back to the top

Also see B group Contract aerial curves, and how the aerial groups evolved.

Notes : The dates of 1969 and 1995 (for the changes in the groups) are approximate.

1969 was the year that BBC1 and ITV joined BBC2 in being transmitted on UHF.

Channel 5 began transmission on the 30th of March 1997, but planning for this had started years before this. A helpful contact in the aerial industry has informed me that the extending of the aerial groups was being undertaken 18 months to two years before the actual launch of C5, giving 1995. However aerials designed under the previous group designations would probably still have been on sale/being fitted months (or even years) after 1995.

Most important of all, the groups frequency responses are approximate, very approximate !

For instance, an E group is really a  wideband with an emphasis on the top end frequencies.

The K group needs clarification as well, particularly post switchover when there are a significant number of K group transmitters. The K may technically finish at CH48 but every K group I`ve ever tested actually works fine up to CH53 or beyond, thus the K group actually includes quite a few transmitters, e.g. Sandy whose top channel is on CH52.

Back to the top

Back to the top

Back to the top

Back to the top

Back to the top

Back to the top

Back to the top

The story of C/D.   

I`m sure you`ve often wondered what is the story behind the C/D aerial group,

I know I have and I don`t think I`m autistic.

Well perhaps a little.

My wife reckons all men have autistic tendencies and I think she could be right. The question is, can you actually be autistic if you take the mickey out of yourself for being autistic ?  

After pondering that little psychological question we can now move on to the origins of the C/D group.....

When UHF transmissions first started in 1964 the C group was CH52 to CH68 though it was later changed to CH50 to 66.  However an additional D group (blue bung) was also added which was CH49 to CH68. I can`t imagine there`d be much difference between aerials of those three groups but there we go. Finally in 1969 the C and D groups were amalgamated into one, the C/D group at CH48 to CH68.

C/D group TV aerial gain curves E group TV aerial gain curves

We are more than willing to give advice to those actually purchasing from us. Could those only seeking information please just find the answer somewhere on this site, or ring an aerial installer local to them, or call the reception advice phone numbers.

B group TV aerial gain curves

If you`ve found this site informative and, hopefully, interesting as well,

please help us increase the number of people reading it.

Back to the top

The evolution of British UHF TV aerial groups (A, B, C/D, E, K, T)

Testing decent quality aerials is all very well, but what about the cheapies that many people may already have up, or be put up by a tight arse aerial installer ?

Above we have two Contract 10Bs, an old Contract 18B (possibly 20 to 30 years old ?), two Contract 18Bs, plus the Yagi18B and the XB16B which we sell.

I was particularly interested to find out how much difference a balun made to the performance of an aerial and in the above tests the two Contract 10s are identical save for one having a balun and the other not. From those curves, and the others come to that, it can be seen that a balun does seem to have an effect on gain, particularly outside the aerials designed for band.

It will be noted that the gain of the old Contract 18B was dipping way before even CH53, which is the top of the B group. As can be seen below the B group used to finish at CH51, but even so, the aerial is dropping off too early.

Now, all aerial gain curves have bumps and dips in them, so on this site (and in fact all published aerial gain curves....) they are smoothed off for clarity, but the huge dip in the gain of the Contract 18B without a balun is of a different order altogether. This is typical of some Contract type aerials, beware.

A group TV aerial gain curves K group TV aerial gain curves Wideband and T group TV aerial gain curves TYpical Contract 10 aerial gain curves B group contract aerial gain curves

Extending the Groups

Whilst on the subject of B groups when UHF TV transmissions began in 1964 the B group was CH39-CH51, but it has since been extended up to CH53. During my research for a definite date for this a helpful contact at Ofcom found a guide to TV transmitters dated 1974 and that had the

B group up to CH53 so it must have changed prior to that date, possibly when BBC1 and ITV started UHF transmissions in 1969 ? Furthermore the "Practical Aerial Handbook" of 1970 seems to confirm that because it reports that the Radio and Electronic Component Manufacturers Federation have revised the aerial groups, Group B is now CH39 to CH53.  The same article also states that group C/D was extended down from CH52-CH68  to  CH48-CH68

The B group, and the E group, were also extended down to CH35 (from CH39) around 1995 when the planning for C5 transmissions (from 1997) was beginning. At this same time group A was extended up from CH34 to CH37 because some group A transmitters (Crystal Palace being the most obvious example) were having to transmit C5 on CH37, though somewhat confusingly, in the case of Crystal Palace, it was actually transmitted from Croydon !

It must be said that extending aerial groups down a few channels is usually a bit irrelevant because Yagi antennas generally work pretty well below their designed for bands, although, (as explained above) Contract type aerials [and some others without Baluns ? ] don`t  always work quite as well as decent antennas.

Back to the top

Addition of the T group : The latest (but quite possibly not the last) change to the aerial groups is the addition of the T group in 2013. This is effectively a truncated wideband which is a first in that up to now, in our little history lesson, all has been about extending not truncating ! Anyway, this pruning of the wideband is to allow for the fact that from July 2013 onwards there are no TV transmissions over CH60. That part of the spectrum having been sold off for 4G mobile phone use. Now those transmissions may well cause problems with TV reception so it`s actually preferable to have an aerial which doesn`t pick up over CH60. Isn`t it funny how the old ways (in this case aerial groups, specifically A, B & K) are often found to be the best in the end !

However : If you`re on a wideband transmitter and really do need a high gain aerial (most people don`t) we still recommend a high gain wideband over a T group despite the fact widebands are technically obsolete. This is because all T groups start dropping of in their gain curves in the mid high (channel) 50s to try and minimise 4G interference, though I`m sceptical if they do much good at it….. But if you`re in a poor spot you need high gain there ! So I`d go for a high gain wideband and in if you do have 4G problems get a filter which will work better at preventing 4G interference anyway. This is particularly the case when the filters are free from at800 ! !

There are rumours that TV transmissions may eventually be restricted to the K group (the 700MHz clearance and all that), and, possibly, even further into the future, the A group. Cynics like me even wonder if all TV transmission in the UK will end up in the “CH31-37 gap” !

Fortunately all (decent) grouped aerials - apart from C/Ds - still work down at CH21 so, to be frank, I wouldn`t worry about these potential changes too much.

In November 2014 Ofcom more or less confirmed that the 700MHz clearance would take place. That is to say clearing all TV transmissions between CHs 49 and 60. I believe this may herald the start of a long road to complete cessation of terrestrial transmissions though it remains to be seen how long that will take, it would be a very brave (read suicidal) politician who announced the death of TV reception through your aerial !  But back to what we do know, the 700MHz clearance is effectively the death of the C/D group, which is a bit sad actually……

Link to table