All Rights reserved
Main Page List
Online Shop
Search This Site
Free delivery on orders over £100.
Gain (curves), Again (See Aerial Tests)
This page is strictly for the cognoscenti (mainly “the trade”), and those with
an unhealthy interest in TV aerial performance.......
The gain curves are conservative estimates, but I bet they`re not that far out.........
One things for sure, they`re all accurate relative to each other, which is what matters !
Note these curves are in dBd, that is gain compared to a half wave dipole,
NOT (the dishonest ? ) dBi....
Typical Contract 10 gain curves
B group Contract aerial curves (including Extending The Aerial Groups)
A group gain curves and comparisons
B group gain curves and comparisons
C/D group gain curves and comparisons
K group gain curves and comparisons
Just how much gain do you get from a 10 element Contract aerial ?
These were relatively good quality Contracts (they had baluns) and it cannot be overstressed that some Contract aerials` performance can be very inconsistent, and this is particularly the case outside of their designed for group, see below.
Note that the A group curve is that for post 1995 aerials, when the A group was extended up to CH 37 from CH 34, see below. Thus the response curve for aerials fitted prior to this date would be about three channels down.
Also see B group Contract aerial curves, and how the aerial groups evolved.
Notes : The dates of 1969 and 1995 (for the changes in the groups) are approximate.
1969 was the year that BBC1 and ITV joined BBC2 in being transmitted on UHF.
Channel 5 began transmission on the 30th of March 1997, but planning for this had started years before this. A helpful contact in the aerial industry has informed me that the extending of the aerial groups was being undertaken 18 months to two years before the actual launch of C5, giving 1995. However aerials designed under the previous group designations would probably still have been on sale/being fitted months (or even years) after 1995.
Most important of all, the groups frequency responses are approximate, very approximate !
For instance, an E group is really a wideband with an emphasis on the top end frequencies.
The K group needs clarification as well, particularly post switchover when there are a significant number of K group transmitters. The K may technically finish at CH48 but every K group I`ve ever tested actually works fine up to CH53 or beyond, thus the K group actually includes quite a few transmitters, e.g. Sandy whose top channel is on CH52.
Whilst on the subject of B groups when UHF TV transmissions began in 1964 the B group
was CH39-
B group up to CH53 so it must have changed prior to that date, possibly when BBC1
and ITV started UHF transmissions in 1969 ? Furthermore the "Practical Aerial Handbook"
of 1970 seems to confirm that because it reports that the Radio and Electronic Component
Manufacturers Federation have revised the aerial groups, Group B is now CH39 to CH53.
The same article also states that group C/D was extended down from CH52-
The B group, and the E group, were also extended down to CH35 (from CH39) around 1995 when the planning for C5 transmissions (from 1997) was beginning. At this same time group A was extended up from CH34 to CH37 because some group A transmitters (Crystal Palace being the most obvious example) were having to transmit C5 on CH37, though somewhat confusingly, in the case of Crystal Palace, it was actually transmitted from Croydon !
It must be said that extending aerial groups down a few channels is usually a bit irrelevant because Yagi antennas generally work pretty well below their designed for bands, although, (as explained above) Contract type aerials [and some others without Baluns ? ] don`t always work quite as well as decent antennas.
The story of C/D.
I`m sure you`ve often wondered what is the story behind the C/D aerial group,
I know I have and I don`t think I`m autistic.
Well perhaps a little.
My wife reckons all men have autistic tendencies and I think she could be right. The question is, can you actually be autistic if you take the mickey out of yourself for being autistic ?
After pondering that little psychological question we can now move on to the origins of the C/D group.....
When UHF transmissions first started in 1964 the C group was CH52 to CH68 though it was later changed to CH50 to 66. However an additional D group (blue bung) was also added which was CH49 to CH68. I can`t imagine there`d be much difference between aerials of those three groups but there we go. Finally in 1969 the C and D groups were amalgamated into one, the C/D group at CH48 to CH68.
Addition of the T group : The latest (but quite possibly not the last) change to the aerial groups is the addition of the T group in 2013. This is effectively a truncated wideband which is a first in that up to now, in our little history lesson, all has been about extending not truncating ! Anyway, this pruning of the wideband is to allow for the fact that from July 2013 onwards there are no TV transmissions over CH60. That part of the spectrum having been sold off for 4G mobile phone use. Now those transmissions may well cause problems with TV reception so it`s actually preferable to have an aerial which doesn`t pick up over CH60. Isn`t it funny how the old ways (in this case aerial groups, specifically A, B & K) are often found to be the best in the end !
There are rumours that TV transmissions may eventually be restricted to the K group,
and, possibly, even further into the future, the A group….. Fortunately all (decent)
grouped aerials -
We are more than willing to give advice to those actually purchasing from us. Could those only seeking information please just find the answer somewhere on this site, or ring an aerial installer local to them, or call the reception advice phone numbers.
If you`ve found this site informative and, hopefully, interesting as well,
please help us increase the number of people reading it.
Testing decent quality aerials is all very well, but what about the cheapies that many people may already have up, or be put up by a tight arse aerial installer ?
Above we have two Contract 10Bs, an old Contract 18B (possibly 20 to 30 years old ?), two Contract 18Bs, plus the Yagi18B and the XB16B which we sell.
I was particularly interested to find out how much difference a balun made to the performance of an aerial and in the above tests the two Contract 10s are identical save for one having a balun and the other not. From those curves, and the others come to that, it can be seen that a balun does seem to have an effect on gain, particularly outside the aerials designed for band.
It will be noted that the gain of the old Contract 18B was dipping way before even CH53, which is the top of the B group. As can be seen below the B group used to finish at CH51, but even so, the aerial is dropping off too early.
Now, all aerial gain curves have bumps and dips in them, so on this site (and in fact all published aerial gain curves....) they are smoothed off for clarity, but the huge dip in the gain of the Contract 18B without a balun is of a different order altogether. This is typical of some Contract type aerials, beware.
