
Main Page List
TV Repairs (Including unbiased advice on purchasing a TV)
TV Repairs (including Tube Failures and Plasma/LCD TV`s, we do not repair the latter)
TV Retunes / Set-
Batteries, Zinc Carbon v Alkaline v NiMh Rechargeable (Some experiments ! )
Low Energy Bulbs v Incandescent Bulbs, not that simple........

We are more than willing to give advice to those actually purchasing from us.
Could those only seeking information please just find the answer somewhere on this site,
or ring an aerial installer local to them, or call the reception advice phone numbers.
Further to the above article we had this E Mail from Pat Molloy (March 2011)
Am now retired but held a research fellowship at Leipzig Uni developing battery technology
in conjunction with a German battery company (Ansmann). Sanyo ripped off the technology
and launched commercially around 2005. The technology is now becoming ubiquitous.
There
is no such thing as a battery for all seasons but this new generation of low self
discharge batteries comes close.
NiMH can hold around 4x the milliamp hours than
alkaline. So for high drain applications (camera, model boat racing etc) it's NiMH
every time. But in a bedside clock or a TV remote the issue is the discharge rate.
Hand torches present a slightly different situation. Doing nothing for long periods
then high drain for short periods (that was before LED torches!).
Eneloop, Hybrio
and the like are known as "low self discharge" and hold their charge sufficiently
well that they are sold pre-
Self discharge for Alkaline is typically 3% per annum. These new batteries
have a much higher (than alkaline) self discharge -
I put
some into my equipment during development. I reckon the battery in my bedside clock
was installed around 2003 and is still going. I could recharge it now but am curious
to see just how long it will last! The PP3 (9v) equivalent in my smoke alarms also
looks like matching Li-
Li-
Hope this helps.
Google "low self discharge" batteries and see for yourself.
Incandescent Light Bulbs To Be Banned *
Incandescent light bulbs are to be phased out as part of a green agenda. I`m pretty
environmentally aware, I walk to work, only drive about 4,000m per year and catch the train
despite the horrendous cost. BUT banning incandescent bulbs is politically correct bollox.
Why ? Well it can even be argued that low energy light bulbs to more harm than good
because I`d be rich if I had a pound for every time I heard “I`m green but I can still fly a few times a year on my holidays and use my car as often as I want because I`ve got low
energy light bulbs" (and recycle my newspapers, obviously).
Let`s be honest about this, using low energy light bulbs is a drop in the ocean compared to
using the car less, flying less or even turning down the heating. The thing is that all those
require a bit of a compromise in life style, so far fewer people actually do them.
But the most misunderstood factor is that low energy light bulbs are not necessarily that
much more efficient than incandescent bulbs. Low energy bulbs do use significantly less
energy to produce a given amount of light because they run cooler. However in this country
for most of the year we`ve got the heating on, we certainly did in February 2009 when I was
writing this article, it was bleedin` freezing.
Under those circumstances incandescent bulbs are 100% efficient, because that heat goes
to help warm up your house. Change 4 x 100W bulbs for 4 x 25W low energy bulbs.
Result ? 300W more heating required ! The same principle applies to any electrical product,
if you make it more efficient it`ll run cooler. Furthermore, all those things you leave in
standby are using up extra power, but it is helping heat up your house as well. In this
country turning them off will not save you the full amount of that power, this certainly
applies in the Winter and possibly the Spring and the Autumn as well. I accept that on the rare hot days we get that the by product heat is actually a negative, but lights are required far less in the summer and opening a window will dump far more heat than the 300W contributed by the bulbs in the above example.
Then there`s the fact that manufacturing low energy bulbs takes far more energy and uses
far more resources.
Incidentally, the fact that the heat from electrical appliances also warms up your house does not just apply to lights. For instance, if you boil more water than you need for your cup of tea, as the kettle cools down that heat is not “wasted” (not in the winter anyway), it`s warming up your house.
Having said all the above, it should be borne in mind that gas heating is cheaper and more efficient than electric heating, which is effectively what you`re using with incandescent bulbs,
or unused water in the kettle !
So yes, low energy bulbs are more energy efficient, but those figures you read of saving 75% power are absolute bollocks, in this country at any rate.
How good are low energy bulbs (technical name compact fluorescent bulbs or CFLs) at
actually giving off light ? Many of us have taken the lighting equivalent given on the box with
a large pinch of salt, and we`re right to do so. Even the European Commission, which is
behind all this legislation, admits that many of the lighting claims of the CFLs are "not true". Furthermore many of us have always known what a report in the Institute of Engineering &
Technology confirmed, that is, that CFLs light output declines with time. The research in
the latter journal indicated that whilst incandescent bulbs may drop by up to 7% in their
light output, CFLs routinely drop by 22% (or more) as they age.
And all that`s before we talk about low energy bulbs not working with dimmer switches and
they take a lot longer to come on to full brightness. I only use CFL bulbs in locations
without dimmer switches and which aren`t constantly being turned on/off.
There are even (unproven) theories about that low energy light bulbs cause headaches.....
* Importation of 100w incandescent bulbs banned from Aug 09,
Importation of 60w incandescent bulbs banned from Sept 2011
Importation of all incandescent bulbs banned from Sept 2012
If you`ve found this site informative and, hopefully, interesting as well,
please help us increase the number of people reading it.